NFL Week 5 DraftKings DFS Picks: Sunday Main Slate (Oct. 11, 2026)
Week 5 DraftKings picks for October 11: Detroit-Arizona stacks, Michael Wilson, value backs, tournament pivots and a salary-checked lineup.

Late update, October 11: The Chargers’ 2:43 p.m. ET official report confirms Ladd McConkey and Charlie Kolar are active; Quentin Johnston and Brenen Thompson are inactive. Reassess Harris and Gadsden late swaps without assuming McConkey sits. The sample lineup and numerical estimates below reflect the pre-lock article.
- Slate Outlook
- Core Players
- Michael Wilson ($6,200), Arizona
- Jahmyr Gibbs ($9,800), Detroit
- D'Andre Swift ($6,200), Chicago
- Chris Olave ($7,700), New Orleans
- Nico Collins ($7,500), Houston
- Brock Purdy ($6,500), San Francisco
- Top Stacks and Runbacks
- Detroit balanced passing stack
- Arizona concentration stack
- Seattle condensed stack
- Raiders passing stack
- Value and Injury-Dependent Savings
- GPP Alternatives Worth the Risk
- Defense Choices
- DraftKings GPP Lineup Example
- Construction and Late-Swap Plan
The 11-game DraftKings Sunday Main slate locks October 11 at 1 p.m. ET. We break down the core plays, stacks, value options and a sample GPP lineup, with a late-swap plan for the afternoon games. Chicago-Green Bay is in the early window after its kickoff change; Philadelphia-Jacksonville, Sunday Night Football and Monday Night Football are separate slates.
Detroit-Arizona is our preferred game to build around. Michael Wilson’s receiving volume stands out at $6,200, while the Lions give us several ways to spend at the top. We want to decide which part of that offense we expect to do the scoring before filling out the lineup.
Slate Outlook
At a 54.5 total and Detroit favored by 5.5, the implied scores would be 30 for Detroit and 24.5 for Arizona. The next group of games sits well below it, making this the clearest place to pay for multiple skill players.
Seattle-San Francisco is our preferred late-game alternative. Raiders-Patriots offers cheaper passing stacks and significant personnel changes. Chicago-Green Bay has a useful Swift-versus-Packers-passing construction, although Chicago’s strong early pass-defense results keep us from treating it as an easy matchup.
Rain deserves attention in Washington, Pittsburgh and at MetLife. Washington has east winds around 14 mph at kickoff easing toward 10 mph late in the game, with early gusts around 26 mph. Pittsburgh has rain and winds around 9 to 12 mph through the game; MetLife has rain and winds around 12 to 13 mph. The National Weather Service forecasts winds around 20 mph near State Farm Stadium, but the roof decision is unconfirmed. If the roof is open, reassess Arizona-Detroit passing stacks against the actual conditions; if it is closed, the outdoor forecast should not drive a wind downgrade.
Core Players
Michael Wilson ($6,200), Arizona
Wilson is our first receiving-value consideration. He has 44 targets through four games, an average of 11 per game. He played 94% of the snaps in Week 4, giving us an established full-game role.
He fits alongside Jacoby Brissett or opposite Jared Goff. Wilson and Trey McBride already play nearly every snap and command much of Arizona’s passing game. Harrison is reportedly expected to be inactive, which could concentrate targets further, but his receiving role has been small. Wilson and McBride’s appeal starts with the work they already earn; Harrison’s possible absence adds only a modest amount of available volume.
Detroit is missing Brian Branch and Rock Ya-Sin, giving Arizona a more inviting secondary to attack. The Cardinals are also replacing left tackle Paris Johnson Jr. and right guard Isaiah Adams. Brissett needs time to turn those coverage opportunities into completions. Wilson and McBride can succeed together if Arizona has to keep throwing, but protection trouble is a shared risk for the entire stack.
Jahmyr Gibbs ($9,800), Detroit
Gibbs is the premium running back we most want when salary allows. His first four games produced 80 carries and 22 receptions, giving him paths to a ceiling through both phases. A Detroit passing stack can include him when catches and receiving touchdowns are part of the story.
The $9,800 salary is demanding. A lineup built around several Gibbs rushing touchdowns should usually spend less on Detroit’s passing game. He can be an excellent play without being mandatory in every Goff lineup.
D'Andre Swift ($6,200), Chicago
Swift has no game designation and Kyle Monangai is out, giving him a strong workload case at this price. Roschon Johnson moves up to No. 2, and Ben Johnson praised his running, receiving and pass protection. Those skills give Roschon ways to stay involved on both rushing and passing downs. Swift is our preferred back here, but the receiving work and carries near the goal line could still be shared.
Monangai reached 30 carries in a game where Swift received no further touches after his third-quarter fumble. That unusual split leaves room for Swift to lead this week without inheriting every one of Monangai’s carries.
Chicago has announced Tyson Bagent as its starter. He threw 34 times for 268 yards last week while the Bears held the ball for more than 42 minutes. That is evidence he can sustain drives, though it would be a stretch to count on another game with that much possession. Chicago has also scored touchdowns on just four of its past 15 red-zone trips. The extra carries make Swift appealing; a touchdown still depends on Chicago finishing drives and giving him the ball near the goal line. Pairing him with a Jordan Love stack works when Chicago finishes drives on the ground and Green Bay answers through the air.
Chris Olave ($7,700), New Orleans
Olave is our preferred core receiver over Smith-Njigba at a $1,100 saving. He has at least eight catches in every game and 491 receiving yards through four weeks. That repeated reception volume gives us a strong starting point even with only one touchdown so far.
He has no game designation after full Friday practice. We like him as a standalone receiver or with Tyler Shough when betting on New Orleans keeping pace. Minnesota’s blitz pressure can shorten drives and force rushed throws, so protection is the main risk to the target-volume case.
Nico Collins ($7,500), Houston
Collins is a core receiving option at $7,500. He has seven catches in each of his two appearances, including 118 yards and two touchdowns in his Week 4 return. That is a small sample, but it establishes a meaningful receiving role without needing another two-touchdown game.
He carries no game designation, while Tank Dell is out. We like Collins with C.J. Stroud or as a standalone receiver when the main stack is elsewhere. The risk is Houston controlling the game without a large passing total. Braden Smith is out on the offensive line, and tackle Nate Thomas is inactive, adding protection concerns. Jaylin Noel, Kayshon Boutte and Xavier Hutchinson also contributed in his return, giving Stroud alternatives when coverage follows Collins.
Brock Purdy ($6,500), San Francisco
Purdy joins our quarterback core at 3% projected ownership. He has multiple passing touchdowns in all four games and 122 rushing yards, giving him a path through efficient passing plus useful scrambling. A competitive Seattle game would keep both parts of that ceiling in play.
Pair him with George Kittle or Mike Evans, with Smith-Njigba as a Seattle runback when salary allows. Seattle’s defense is a difficult test, and a McCaffrey-led rushing win could leave Purdy short of the passing volume and touchdowns this build needs.
Top Stacks and Runbacks
Detroit balanced passing stack
Jared Goff ($6,600) + Amon-Ra St. Brown ($7,900) + Sam LaPorta ($4,900) + Michael Wilson ($6,200). Combined salary: $25,600.
This leaves $24,400 for two running backs, one receiver, FLEX and defense. St. Brown supplies the catch-volume path; LaPorta gives us a cheaper route to Detroit receiving scores; Wilson supplies the Arizona response. We prefer this balance when we want two Goff partners without forcing several low-volume punts elsewhere.
Jameson Williams ($5,900) can replace LaPorta for $1,000 more, shifting the bet toward explosive passing. Williams had eight targets and 102 yards last week. His deep opportunities create a genuine ceiling, but missed connections and target competition remain part of the price.
Arizona concentration stack
Jacoby Brissett ($5,500) + Michael Wilson ($6,200) + Trey McBride ($6,700) + Amon-Ra St. Brown ($7,900). Combined salary: $26,300.
The $5,500 quarterback allows us to buy both Arizona volume pieces. This works best when Detroit scores early and Arizona has to keep throwing. McBride and Wilson can compete for targets while still succeeding together if the overall attempt total is high enough.
Using Gibbs as the runback costs $1,900 more than St. Brown and expresses a different Detroit scoring mix. Moving from Goff to Brissett still leaves the lineup heavily dependent on the same game. It is a quarterback choice, not complete diversification.
Seattle condensed stack
Sam Darnold ($5,800) + Jaxon Smith-Njigba ($8,800) + George Kittle ($5,200). Combined salary: $19,800.
At $19,800, this keeps enough room for a strong backfield. We prefer starting with one Seattle catcher rather than requiring two receivers to reach their ceilings against San Francisco. Kittle supplies the opposing receiving path.
Christian McCaffrey ($8,200) is the more expensive runback when we want San Francisco production through rushing and receiving. Mike Evans ($6,500) and Deebo Samuel Sr. ($5,500) offer different passing and manufactured-touch combinations. Evans has no game designation; there is no injury-based reason to award all of his work to Kittle or Deebo.
Raiders passing stack
Kirk Cousins ($5,400) + Brock Bowers ($7,000) + Tre Tucker ($4,800) + Romeo Doubs ($5,000). Combined salary: $22,200.
New England’s depleted cornerback group makes this a worthwhile alternative. Bowers has been cleared, and Tucker has an explosive-play path with Jalen Nailor out. We like the combined cost enough to consider both Raiders receivers, while acknowledging that tight-end-heavy personnel can keep Tucker’s target share modest.
Doubs is the Patriots runback after a six-catch, two-touchdown Week 4. New England’s receiver absences help his opportunity case, but another two-touchdown game is the upside outcome. Drake Maye ($6,300) with Doubs and Hunter Henry ($3,700) is the opposing branch. Maye’s rushing can support a ceiling without requiring both pass catchers to score.
Value and Injury-Dependent Savings
- Roman Wilson ($3,700): Our preferred sub-$4,000 receiver has drawn six targets in each of the first four games. Pittman’s absence offers additional opportunity, but Metcalf, Bernard and the tight ends compete for it. Wilson fits an Aaron Rodgers stack or a one-off salary saver. His established targets justify the $300 premium over Bernard when it fits. A smaller passing total remains the main concern. Check Pittsburgh’s game-time weather before committing.
- Emanuel Wilson ($5,300): Our preferred lower-cost back with an established rushing role. With Jadarian Price on injured reserve, Wilson handled 21 carries and three catches last week. Charbonnet remains out, but George Holani took seven carries in that game and has drawn more targets than Wilson this season. Holani remains questionable, so his availability matters to both the carry split and the passing work. If Holani sits, Wilson’s workload case gets stronger, with new arrival Robert Henry Jr. supplying depth. If Holani plays, leave room for a supporting back who can take more than occasional carries. Wilson can justify interest at this price without repeating last week’s two touchdowns.
- Braelon Allen ($5,400): Hall’s absence opens lead rushing work. Allen’s 14 carries last week came in an offense that ran only 32 plays, leaving room for more opportunity if drives improve. Passing-down work and a low-scoring, weather-sensitive game keep the floor uncertain.
- Tre' Harris ($4,100): Johnston and Brenen Thompson are out. McConkey is officially active, as is Charlie Kolar. Harris already played 93% of the snaps last week, so the upside is earning more targets within a large existing role. Denver is without Pat Surtain II and Riley Moss, making the coverage matchup more inviting. Herbert still has to survive behind a line missing Slater, Alt, Penning and Awosika. If pressure forces quicker throws, Gadsden and Keaton Mitchell are other available outlets. McConkey’s availability removes the expected-absence boost to Harris’ target case, and those throws can still be spread around. We like the price for tournaments while recognizing that protection problems can stall the whole offense.
- Germie Bernard ($3,400): Pittsburgh has specifically identified him as a player who must step up with Pittman out. He is a useful salary saver if the route role materializes. Rain and an unsettled target split make him a tournament piece.
- Mike Washington Jr. ($4,200), TreVeyon Henderson ($5,000) and Kendre Miller ($4,900): Jeanty, Stevenson and Kamara are active, so none of these backups gets a missing-starter workload upgrade. Stevenson’s knee still creates workload uncertainty, but availability alone does not establish a larger Henderson role.
GPP Alternatives Worth the Risk
Luther Burden III ($4,900), Chicago: Burden has 11 catches for 124 yards across his last two games. At 11% projected ownership, we like him as a cheaper Chicago response to a Jordan Love passing stack or alongside Tyson Bagent. His receiving work offers a different Chicago scoring path from Swift. Rome Odunze and Colston Loveland compete for throws, and another rushing-led Bears game could limit Burden’s opportunities.
Jonathan Taylor ($7,800), Indianapolis: Taylor has at least 19 carries in every game, with 86 carries and six rushing touchdowns through four weeks. He has no game designation. At 11% projected ownership, he is our preferred addition over Jeremiyah Love for a stronger established rushing workload, and he saves $2,000 from Gibbs. Use him as a standalone back or opposite a Pittsburgh passing stack. Pittsburgh’s front can still make those carries inefficient, and Taylor has only three catches across his last two games, making rushing production important to his ceiling.
Isaiah Likely ($4,300), New York Giants: Likely offers tight-end savings at 9% projected ownership against Washington. He has 22 catches through four games, including seven for 66 yards last week, and no game designation after full Friday practice. Pair him with Jameis Winston or use him as a standalone tight end. Washington’s defensive absences create opportunities, but Nabers and the other receivers still compete for throws. Likely’s two-catch, 13-yard Week 3 shows the downside if those targets land elsewhere; check game-time conditions before committing.
Chase Brown ($6,900): Brown’s receiving work keeps him in the tournament pool alongside the more popular workload backs. He has 21 catches through four games, including 11 last week. A Cincinnati lead can support carries, while catches give him another path if Miami keeps the game competitive. Chase and Higgins are active after full Friday practice. Brown remains a popular play at 18% projected ownership, but Chase and Higgins returning makes another 11-catch game a poor baseline.
Quinshon Judkins ($5,700): Judkins offers a lower-owned running-back route at 5% projected ownership. He has 18 and 17 carries in his last two games, plus six catches last week. That is enough work to consider a Cleveland rushing-and-defense build. His three yards per carry through four games and the low-scoring environment keep him behind our core backs.
Jaylen Waddle ($6,100), Denver: At 6% projected ownership, Waddle is a late-window tournament option alongside Bo Nix. His Week 2 line of eight catches for 138 yards shows the ceiling, but the following two games produced only 45 yards combined. The Chargers are without Donte Jackson and Derwin James, giving Denver openings to attack. Sutton, Engram and Harvey remain target competition, and Denver could need fewer throws if its defense controls the game.
Malik Nabers ($6,300): Nabers has no game designation after full Friday practice. His 6.5 targets per game and 5% projected ownership make him a tournament alternative with Jameis Winston or as a standalone receiver. Washington has several defensive absences, but the Giants still need efficient, sustained passing possessions. Check the game-time weather before locking in this ceiling bet; his current receiving volume leaves less room for failed connections than the premium core receivers.
Jordan Love ($5,700) + Christian Watson ($6,400): Watson has already shown a 147-yard, two-touchdown ceiling. Pairing him with Swift tells a clear story: Chicago scores on the ground and Green Bay answers through the air. Matthew Golden ($5,700) saves $700 from Watson. Chicago’s pass defense and the early kickoff are the main cautions.
DK Metcalf ($5,400): Pittman’s absence gives Metcalf a stronger target-concentration case than his early box scores alone. He is a meaningful ceiling alternative if Pittsburgh’s game-time conditions cooperate. Bernard and Roman Wilson can inherit work too, so this is not a one-for-one transfer of Pittman’s targets.
Carnell Tate ($5,300): Nine catches for 145 yards last week show why we should not dismiss him because Tennessee has a low implied score. Tate is active after dealing with a back injury. If unrestricted, he can work as a Houston-stack runback or a standalone receiving-volume bet; availability does not guarantee a full workload, and one breakout does not establish a weekly floor.
Joe Burrow ($6,900) with Chase or Higgins: Cincinnati can produce an efficient passing ceiling even if Miami struggles. The expensive double-receiver stack asks more of game competitiveness. Both receivers are active, but Chase’s recent concussion and Higgins’ groin/neck injuries still make workload confidence important before treating either as a core recommendation.
Defense Choices
Texans ($3,400): Our first look when we can afford the price. Tennessee’s low implied total supports a Houston-control script. We still need sacks and turnovers to separate at defense; a low total alone does not deliver them.
Broncos ($3,200): The Chargers’ offensive-line injuries create a pressure-based argument. Denver’s missing corners can also give Los Angeles efficient completions, so this comes with a clear failure case. Avoid combining Denver with the Herbert-Harris passing ceiling in the same ordinary lineup.
Jets ($2,700): A budget option in a low-total game. Pairing Allen with his defense is reasonable when the lineup assumes New York controls possession, but rain does not guarantee takeaways. Do not sacrifice a substantially better offensive role just to upgrade defense.
DraftKings GPP Lineup Example
- QB: Jared Goff ($6,600)
- RB: D'Andre Swift ($6,200)
- RB: Emanuel Wilson ($5,300)
- WR: Amon-Ra St. Brown ($7,900)
- WR: Tre Tucker ($4,800)
- WR: Tre' Harris ($4,100)
- TE: Sam LaPorta ($4,900)
- FLEX: Michael Wilson ($6,200)
- DST: Texans ($3,400)
Total: $49,400. Salary remaining: $600.
This lineup buys the Goff-St. Brown-LaPorta passing outcome and brings Wilson back from Arizona. Swift and Emanuel Wilson supply the workload-based running backs; Tucker and Harris provide less expensive receiving ceilings. Houston fills defense without an opposing offensive player.
Gibbs is the deliberate omission. If Detroit scores mostly through rushing touchdowns, the entire passing stack suffers. Harris’ role and the Chargers’ protection are the other main risks. The remaining $600 gives us room to react rather than forcing a different player solely to spend the cap.
Construction and Late-Swap Plan
- Chase, Higgins, Jefferson, Jeanty, Stevenson, Kamara and Tate are active; Addison and Dowdle are inactive. Preserve the injury-related workload risks when choosing among them. Chicago-Green Bay locks with the 1 p.m. ET games.
- Only Denver-Los Angeles, Detroit-Arizona and San Francisco-Seattle remain in the late Main window. Keep late players in FLEX where possible; Michael Wilson occupies it in the example.
- Build actual salary-and-position swaps before lock. A questionable $5,600 receiver cannot always be replaced by any similarly priced player once early positions are locked.
- Review how the early lineup performed. A lineup with a strong start can retain the best-supported remaining roles; a lineup that needs a major comeback may need a different late scoring outcome. Neither choice should be based on projected ownership alone.
Check the Sunday Main projections and injury tracker before lock, and replace any inactive players.
