Skip to content
NFL Research
LATEST CTS

COVER THE SLATE

Explore CTS

Learn the game

We cover the slate so you don’t have to cover the entire internet.

Find your next read

Search a team, player, sport or strategy topic.

NFL DFS Week 8: 8 Picks Under 10% Ownership

Eight Week 8 DraftKings plays projected under 10% ownership, including Lamar Jackson, T.J. Hockenson, Brock Bowers and Drake London.

Published Last updated 6 min read
PAST SLATE Nov 1, 2026
DraftKings · 1:00 PM EST
Share on X
Cover The Slate NFL Week 8 DraftKings DFS: 8 Picks Under 10% Ownership — November 1, 2026

Lamar Jackson, T.J. Hockenson and Brock Bowers give me three different starting points. London and Bernard bring receiving volume at different prices, Walker supplies a selective expensive rushing ceiling, Pollard fits some Cincinnati builds, and Cleveland offers a salary-saving defense with a credible sack opportunity.

These are CTS projected ownership estimates for the November 1 DraftKings Main slate, generated November 1 at 7:18 a.m. EST. They are not observed contest ownership.

A.J. Brown and TreVeyon Henderson are out. Stevenson and Henry have more work available, while Kiner, newly signed Lan Larison and elevated receiver Ryan Miller keep the supporting roles unsettled.

Player Salary Opponent Projected ownership
Lamar Jackson $6,800 at BUF 7.7%
T.J. Hockenson $4,600 at DET 6.6%
Kenneth Walker III $8,800 at DEN 6.9%
Germie Bernard $4,900 vs. CLE 4.6%
Tony Pollard $5,800 at CIN 7.5%
Browns DST $2,600 at PIT 4.9%
Brock Bowers $7,600 at NYJ 3.5%
Drake London $7,000 at TB 5.6%

1. Lamar Jackson: the quarterback, not an overlooked Flowers

Buffalo allows 24.33 DraftKings points per game to quarterbacks, second-most across six games, and 43.32 to receivers, most in the league. Lamar is active against Buffalo after a full Friday practice. The $6,800 price saves $900 from Allen while retaining passing and rushing ways to score. Ravens injury report, CTS fantasy points allowed

Flowers is the first pairing because he has 40 catches for 608 yards, including 8-137 last week with Huntley. His own 22.8% projection is much higher than Lamar’s 7.7%. I like that combination without calling both players contrarian. The two cost $14,000; I do not need to add Andrews merely to make the stack larger. Lamar’s return from an ankle injury still leaves a question about his rushing aggressiveness, even after full practice. Baltimore matchup preview

2. T.J. Hockenson: buy the Detroit matchup

Detroit allows 29.87 DK points per game to tight ends, most in the league across six games. Hockenson costs $4,600 at 6.6% projected ownership; McBride projects at 14.6%. Henry now projects at 18.1% after New England ruled out Brown and Henderson. That is a useful combination of price, opponent and lower popularity. I like Hockenson independently of whether Gibbs appears elsewhere in the lineup.

Detroit’s six-game tight-end total includes 56 catches for 602 yards and 10 touchdowns. The scoring inflates that league-leading fantasy average; the catches and yardage are why I still like the matchup. Detroit has already faced Arizona, Buffalo, Carolina, Green Bay, New Orleans and the Jets, so this is not an opponent-adjusted measure of defensive quality.

His receiving record needs context. Of 27 season catches for 237 yards, 13 catches and 119 yards came in one game. Justin Jefferson was out for that game and has since returned. Last week he had 4-35-1. The ceiling is real, but it has not been a steady weekly role at that level. Aaron Jones practiced fully with no designation, so there is no missing-backfield story to inflate Hockenson’s work. Hockenson’s log, Vikings injury report

3. Kenneth Walker III: an expensive alternative worth considering

Walker has 120 carries for 701 yards and three games above 125 rushing yards, including 173 against Denver in the opener. Denver allows 23.97 DK points per game to running backs over seven games. Walker scored 37.1 DK points in that opener. Excluding the game, Denver allowed 20.32 per game to opposing backfields. His previous success and Denver’s season average are not two independent reasons to expect another big game. Walker’s log

At $8,800 and 6.9%, Walker is my tournament alternative to $9,500 Gibbs at 18.0% against Minnesota’s league-low 16.70 allowed to running backs. This is only $700 of savings, not a value play. Gibbs supplies more consistent receptions, and Walker’s latest 14-36 rushing performance shows how an expensive back can disappoint. I prefer Walker as a standalone play with a passing stack from another game, not alongside Denver DST.

4. Germie Bernard: a reasonable price for recent catches

Bernard’s last three games produced 20 catches and receiving totals of 80, 87 and 27 yards. He costs $4,900 at 4.6%, compared with Godwin’s $4,800 and 12.5%. Bernard has shown enough recent involvement that I do not need one long touchdown to explain the selection. Bernard’s log

Cleveland allows 32.81 DK points per game to receivers over seven games, a middling matchup. Its 20 sacks are a concern against Pittsburgh’s 22 allowed. Freiermuth and Washington also have seven receiving touchdowns between them, while Bernard has one. The catches are the attraction; the end-zone role is less convincing. Steelers statistics, Browns statistics

5. Tony Pollard: selective exposure, not an easy opponent

Pollard’s latest game produced 25 carries for 129 yards and three touchdowns, plus three catches for 26 yards. Sixteen carries came tied or ahead, nine while trailing, and all three catches came while behind. Spears is out again, but the final loss does not prove a 28-touch floor when chasing a big deficit. That is why he is my preferred opposing player for some Burrow stacks at $5,800 and 7.5%. Pollard’s log, Titans injury report

Cincinnati allows only 18.53 DK points per game to running backs, fourth-fewest across six games. Pollard also went without a catch in Weeks 5 and 6. The matchup and uneven receiving contribution keep him below the first four names; last week’s three touchdowns are not a sensible expectation.

6. Browns DST: pressure for $2,600

Cleveland has 20 sacks against a Pittsburgh offense that has allowed 22. At $2,600 and 4.9%, it costs only $300 more than Denver’s more popular $2,300 defense. That extra salary buys a different pressure opportunity without requiring a complete lineup rebuild. Browns statistics, Steelers statistics

I would not pair Cleveland with Bernard in a lineup built around a strong Pittsburgh passing game. Each makes sense in a different construction; low ownership is not a reason to combine conflicting bets.

7. Brock Bowers: premium receiving involvement

At $7,600 and 3.5%, Bowers has at least eight targets and 70 receiving yards in each of his five appearances. His targets have declined from 13 to eight, but the role still supplies a credible ceiling. The Jets have allowed one touchdown on 46 tight-end targets, but their 7.30 yards per target is above the league’s 7.07. The salary, rather than a supposedly prohibitive matchup, requires more than an ordinary six-catch afternoon. I prefer Bowers when spending at tight end and Hockenson when using the $3,000 elsewhere. Bowers’ log

8. Drake London: sustained demand outside the primary stacks

London costs $7,000 at 5.6% and has 31 of Atlanta’s 99 targets across his last three games, catching 18 passes for 246 yards. London–Bucky costs $13,400 and buys established roles from both offenses. All four of his red-zone targets came in the last two games, a useful scoring-area development. Tampa Bay has allowed five receiver touchdowns in seven games, so volume and yardage remain the foundation. London’s log

Tampa’s kickoff-window forecast includes showers and thunderstorms, east winds of 10–12 mph and a 54–63% chance of precipitation. That keeps London selective instead of making Atlanta–Tampa my first full-game passing stack. NWS Tampa forecast

Why Stevenson and Moore are not in the eight

Henderson has now been ruled out. Stevenson now projects at 30.6%, so the improved workload case does not make him an under-10% play. Moore is active, as is Dalton Kincaid. His 7.6% estimate comes from the earlier forecast, before the active list, and Buffalo still has multiple established receiving options. I prefer the eight cases above for this shortlist.

Matchup figures are season-to-date DraftKings points allowed to the entire position, not individual scoring forecasts. For the broader pool, see our tournament picks and values under $4,000.