Skip to content
NFL Research
LATEST CTS

COVER THE SLATE

Explore CTS

Learn the game

We cover the slate so you don’t have to cover the entire internet.

Find your next read

Search a team, player, sport or strategy topic.

NFL DFS Week 2 Usage Report: Role Risers, Fallers, Target Share & Snap Movers

Week 2 NFL DFS usage trends: the biggest workload risers and fallers, target-share jumps, backfield changes and snap movers heading into Week 3.

Published 4 min read
PAST SLATE Sep 22, 2026
Share on X
NFL DFS Week 2 usage report featuring role risers, target share changes and snap movers.

Two weeks gives us something Week 1 cannot: comparison. One big workload can be noise. Two weeks let us see which roles are holding, which are expanding and which changed fast enough to matter for NFL DFS.

The biggest takeaway from the Week 2 usage board is that opportunity moved aggressively in several backfields and passing games. That does not automatically make every riser a Week 3 play. It tells us where to start researching before salary, matchup and ownership shape the final decision.

Workload risers: the biggest Week 2 jumps

Emanuel Wilson made the largest raw opportunity jump on the board, going from 2 combined targets and carries in Week 1 to 22 in Week 2. Tank Bigsby moved from 1 to 15. Jonah Coleman went from 0 to 13, while Omarion Hampton climbed from 12 to 25.

Hampton is especially interesting because this was not a move from no role to a small role. His workload more than doubled from an already usable Week 1 base. That is the kind of change that can matter quickly in DFS if the price does not fully adjust.

Aaron Jones rose from 13 opportunities to 23 and De’Von Achane from 16 to 26. Those are established players receiving even more work, which is different from chasing a reserve who spiked for one week.

Workload fallers: separate role loss from game context

Rhamondre Stevenson fell from 24 opportunities to 8. David Montgomery dropped from 23 to 8. Tyler Allgeier went from 19 to 7, while Bijan Robinson moved from 31 to 20 and Saquon Barkley from 17 to 6.

These numbers need context before they become DFS conclusions. Barkley, for example, dealt with a stinger in Week 2. A workload decline caused by missed time is not the same signal as a healthy player losing work to a teammate. That distinction is exactly why week-to-week usage is useful as a research trigger rather than a standalone projection.

Target-share risers: Rashod Bateman leads the board

Rashod Bateman produced the largest target-share increase among comparable Week 1 and Week 2 records, jumping from 4.2% to 31.0%, a gain of 26.9 percentage points. He followed one Week 1 target with nine targets, seven catches, 88 yards and a touchdown in Week 2.

Terrance Ferguson jumped from 3.7% to 30.0%. Jaylen Waddle moved from 11.1% to 34.5%, Adonai Mitchell from 13.0% to 33.3%, and Christian Watson from 20.0% to 37.9%.

For DFS, target share is often more useful than the fantasy points themselves. Touchdowns can disappear the following week. A receiver commanding roughly one-third of his team’s targets has a repeatable path to volume if the underlying route and snap role remains intact.

Backfield changes: where touches are concentrating

Aaron Jones posted the largest backfield-share increase on the board, moving from 35.3% to 82.1%. Kaleb Johnson went from 0% to 44.4%. Emanuel Wilson jumped from 9.1% to 52.5%, Tank Bigsby from 4.0% to 40.6%, and Jonah Coleman from 0% to 35.7%.

This is where consistency matters. A one-week jump can come from injury, score, game plan or a genuine depth-chart change. The strongest Week 3 signals will be the players whose Week 2 touch growth is supported by snaps, routes and another week of healthy availability.

Snap-share movers: playing time can reveal the next DFS value

Myles Price rose from a 5% snap share to 50%. Konata Mumpfield moved from 26% to 69%. Laquon Treadwell climbed from 35% to 74%, Jacob Cowing from 8% to 46%, and KhaDarel Hodge from 2% to 38%.

Snap growth is most useful when it arrives before a player’s box score catches up. More playing time creates more routes and touch opportunities, but snaps alone do not guarantee targets. For cheap NFL DFS receivers, we want the combination: more snaps, more routes, and evidence that the quarterback is actually looking their way.

Usage consistency: what we want to carry into Week 3

The best DFS signals are not simply the largest green numbers on a week-to-week chart. We want roles that survive multiple tests. Did the player keep his Week 1 opportunity and add to it? Did target share rise because routes increased, or because a teammate left the game? Did an RB gain carries while also staying involved as a receiver? Did snap share rise without any targets?

That framework separates sustainable opportunity from one-week volatility. Hampton’s 12-to-25 opportunity jump deserves attention because he already had a Week 1 role. Bateman’s target-share explosion needs to be weighed against Baltimore’s personnel and injury context. Jones’ backfield concentration is powerful, but his health status matters before treating 82.1% as the new baseline.

Early Week 3 NFL DFS research list

Omarion Hampton: workload growth from an existing role.
Rashod Bateman: massive target-share change backed by nine Week 2 targets.
Emanuel Wilson: the largest raw opportunity increase on the board.
Tank Bigsby: meaningful backfield growth that needs another week of role confirmation.
Jonah Coleman: zero-to-relevant usage jump with both rushing and receiving opportunity worth tracking.
Konata Mumpfield: snap share jumped to 69%, putting him on the cheap-receiver watch list.

Use the board, then build the DFS case

The CTS NFL Usage Tracker is designed to answer the first question: who is actually getting the work? From there, salary, matchup, injury status, expected ownership and ceiling determine whether that workload becomes a DFS play.

Explore NFL usage leaders, weekly role changes and snap movers →